Cases 41 - 50 of 6,162
Mattucci v. Youngkin et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles Mattucci
Defendant:
Warden Youngkin, Mary Babbs, Nurse Caroline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Beasley v. Stark et al
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
. Stark, Kristie Hart, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Brian Johnson, Kristie Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Forrester v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jerry W Forrester
Defendant:
Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Darian L Watson
Defendant:
Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Dakota Elliott
Defendant:
Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bloomquist v. State of Utah, et al
as 24-4022
Plaintiff:
DARRELL C. BLOOMQUIST
Defendant:
STATE OF UTAH, LEONARD ISAACSON, MARK WATKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
