Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Ross v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2011cv01984
Plaintiff:
William Ross
Defendant:
Prince George's County, Maryland , A. Mirza and T., Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joseph Haranzo v. North Carolina Dept of Voc Reh
as 11-1569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH T. HARANZO
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES and WILLIAM ROSS
Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co KG v. Ross
as 1:2011cv10269
Plaintiff:
Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co KG
Defendant:
William Ross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Chirkina v. Schwab et al
as 4:2010cv14792
Plaintiff:
Ziyad Chirkina
Defendant:
James Schwab, William Ross and Warren, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haranzo v. North Carolina Department of Vocational Rehabilitation Services et al
as 4:2010cv00175
Plaintiff:
Joseph T. Haranzo
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Vocational Rehabilitation Services and William Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eddie Watkins v. Sheriff Chad Ledbetter, et al
as 10-3342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddie S. Watkins
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Chad Ledbetter, Former Sheriff, in individual capacity, Lt. Robert Grice, in individual capacity, Sgt. Marsh, in individual capacity and others
Defendant:
Hot Springs County Quorum Court Members
Hope v. Ross et al
as 1:2009cv00762
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Hope
Defendant:
William Ross, Jerome Barnes, Cindy Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
Willie Brown, All Plaintiffs, Stacey Swanier and others
Defendant:
Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. William Hoover
as 09-50670
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ROSS HOOVER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
