Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Wallace Jones v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 16-30909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of Department of Children & Family Services, CHERYL BETHEA, incorrectly referred to as Michelle Bethea, MICHELLE BREAUX and others
Lopez v. Green et al
as 5:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Francisco Lopez, Jr
Defendant:
NFN Green, Miguel Perez, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Louisiana et al
as 6:2015cv01816
Plaintiff:
Wallace Jones
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Michelle Bethea, Michelle Breaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01563
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Jones
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonebright et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02273
Plaintiff:
Clair Nelson Bonebright , Douglas Gene Jelsma , Randy D. Willmott and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv09872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wallace Jones v. Recontrust Company NA et al
as 8:2011cv01534
Petitioner:
Wallace Jones
Respondent:
Recontrust Company NA, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Soundview Home Loan Trust 2007-WMCI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv01705
Petitioner:
Anthony Wallace Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv02752
Plaintiff:
WALLACE JONES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and CLYDE GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
