Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 660
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner: Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent: Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brian Firebaugh, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1130
Petitioner: Brian Firebaugh, Chloe Joy Sexton, Talia Cadet and others
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, in his capacity as United States Attorney General
Spann v. Gov; Henry McMaster et al
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff: Freddy Spann
Defendant: Gov; Henry McMaster and Mental Health Der Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00961
Plaintiff: Yvette Spann
Defendant: Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WALTERS et al v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff: LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant: KERRY J. FORRESTAL, VASQUEZ, T. JADRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff: Jafarris Deon Miller
Defendant: Lee Harris, Tgichona Baldwin, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toon v. Spann et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff: Steven Glen Toon
Defendant: Officer Michael Andrew Spann, Officer Jonathan Sholar and The City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Carlos SpannIn re: Carlos Spann
as 24-30126
Petitioner: In re: Carlos A. Spann
Spann v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner: Ronald Wayne Spann
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hester-Spann v. Franke et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant: Carren Franke, Jeremy K. Nix, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?