Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Cox v. Metro Video Services LLC
as 4:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Cox
Defendant:
Metro Video Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Thomas v. Beadle
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Faye Beadle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Gilbert
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
SATTERFIELD v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
RASSOUL PAUL SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
DETECTIVE WILLIAM THOMAS, DETECTIVE FLOYD GALLO, ASSISTANT DISTRICT SANDY BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cox v. Metro Video Services LLC
as 3:2023cv02880
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Cox
Defendant:
Metro Video Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Hale v. Staley et al
as 4:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Hale
Defendant:
John Staley, Robert Wakefield and Michea Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al v. Paiva
as 23-1919
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. PALMIGIANO, WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, JOHN F. PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAY, WILLIAM THOMAS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RI
Interested Party:
KENNETH WILSON, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, NORMAN WHEELER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00429
Petitioner:
Tu Anh Nguyen
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
George William Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Matthew Jones v. Wiliam Thomas
as 23-2821
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER WILLIAM THOMAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
