Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Leick et al v. Wyoming State Forestry Division et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Defendant:
Wyoming Office of State Lands and Investments Director, Wyoming State Forestry Division State Forester, Wyoming State Forestry Division and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Leick and Amanda Leick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welfel v. Wilkes Barre Police Drug Task Force et al
as 3:2023cv01958
Plaintiff:
William John Welfel
Defendant:
Wilkes Barre Police Drug Task Force, Pennsylvania State Police Vice Squad, Officer Conoboy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Kirsch et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Defendant:
Wyoming Game and Fish Department Game Warden Kirsch, Wyoming Game and Fish Department Game Warden Hymus, Wyoming State Board of Outfitters and Guides Employee Beres and others
Plaintiff:
Melanie M Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wyoming Trust Company et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2023cv00148
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior Secretary, United States Bureau of Land Management Director, United States Bureau of Land Management Appraisal and Valuation Services Office Director and others
Plaintiff:
Wyoming Trust Company (1981), Nancy Butcher (1981), Kurt Hall (1981) and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
West Virginia, State of et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Intervenor:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of and others
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach
Petitioner:
Members of Congress
Amicus Curiae:
Robert M. Miller, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Protection & Advocacy System Inc v. Wyoming Department of Health Director et al
as 2:2022cv00231
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Health Director, Wyoming State Hospital Administrator, Stefan Johansson and others
Plaintiff:
Protection & Advocacy System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
