Cases 1 - 10 of 1,111
Coleman v. Lynds
as 3:2024cv30043
Plaintiff:
Wayland X Coleman
Defendant:
Joann Lynds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Prince et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bruce X. Cooper
Defendant:
Scott Prince and Mark Abel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Yeverton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Rashauwn X. Yeverton
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Write A Prisoner.com
as 3:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Dushaun X. Scott and Dushaun X Scott
Defendant:
Write A Prisoner.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters v. McDonald et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Matthew X Winters
Defendant:
D McDonald, L Gray, Wilsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Rambert v. Warden Greene SCI, et al
as 24-1313
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
WARDEN GREENE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jones v. Ray et al
as 5:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dwight Xavier Jones, Dwight X Jones and Dwight Jones
Defendant:
Director Patricia Ray, Captain Sweat, Officer Tamiko Greg Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Scott v. Write A Prisoner.com
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Dushawn X. Scott and Dushaun X. Scott
Defendant:
Write A Prisoner and Write A Prisoner.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Dante Rodgers
Defendant:
R Ramirez, X Saldana, R Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Michael A. Lujan v. Kevin Hixon et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Defendant:
Kevin Hixon, Lee, Chiu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
