Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Patrick Roether, et al v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-13731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Patrick Roether v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-10036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Hollie Roether v. State of Georgia, et al
as 21-14305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA and others
Roether et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 2:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Isabella Amor, State of Georgia, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Ambassador Patrick Roether and Hollie Roether
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELLENBERGER et al v. JUSTICEWORKS YOUTHCARE, INC.
as 2:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
LEAH ELLENBERGER and CAITLAN SHOOP
Defendant:
JUSTICEWORKS YOUTHCARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roether v. State of Georgia et al
as 2:2020cv00092
Defendant:
McIntosh County DFCS, Does 1-100, Inclusive, Daniel B. Collipp and others
Plaintiff:
Hollie Roether
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program v. SafetyNet YouthCare, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program
Defendant:
SafetyNet YouthCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
Higgins v. Youth Empowerment Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00378
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Higgins
Defendant:
Youth Empowerment Services, Inc., Parson Consulting and Hallmark Youthcare-Richmond, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Strejac v. YouthCare et al
as 2:2009cv00498
Plaintiff:
Andrei P Strejac
Defendant:
YouthCare, City of Seattle, City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
