Cases filed in Connecticut matching "S"
Cases 31 - 40 of 825,151
TAN et al v. LO et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: CHI HUI TAN and KUNG TUAN TAN
Defendant: VICTOR K S LO and EVER SPRING CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01248
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner: Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent: Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Missouri Department of Corrections Women's Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Corrections Center
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Dawn Berry
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections Women's Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Centric Store
as 4:2024cv00606
Plaintiff: David Lettieri
Defendant: Centric Store
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00393
Plaintiff: Danielle S. Edwards
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hinkle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02020
Interested Party: SSA
Plaintiff: Michaela S. Hinkle
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant: M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?