Cases 21 - 30 of 827,265
Magness v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Heather Magness
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Perrier v. Ortiz et al
as 2:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Mr. Felipe Anthony Perrier
Defendant:
Mauro Esteban Ortiz and Piedra Transport, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Motedata Inc. v. Track What Matters, L.L.C.
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Motedata Inc.
Defendant:
Track What Matters, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Medina v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Medina
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mola #365547 v. Ramirez
as 3:2024cv08096
Plaintiff:
John Mola
Defendant:
Hecter Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madsen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jerry Madsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watson v. Philhours et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Owen Watson
Defendant:
Randy Philhours and Mike Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADITXT, INC. v. NEW DAY DIAGNOSTICS, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02988
Plaintiff:
ADITXT, INC.
Defendant:
NEW DAY DIAGNOSTICS, LLC and Navroze S Mehta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Riles v. City of Fremont et al
as 3:2024cv02986
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Riles
Defendant:
City of Fremont and Christopher Borzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
