Cases 31 - 40 of 826,602
CAREY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. CAREY, JR.
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. Goguen et al
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Ryan Adam Dixon
Defendant:
Jie Liang Goguen and John/Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Schmidt et al v. Kaliber Management et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Julie Schmidt and Leon Gerhard
Defendant:
Kaliber Management and Bayou Mobile Home Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Grace v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Kevorkian De'Hon Grace
Defendant:
Warden Lionel Johnson and Disciplinary Officer Tirah Sanders
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QBE Specialty Insurance Company v. CITY OF MIAMI et al
as 1:2024cv21854
Plaintiff:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI, Joe Carollo, Arthur Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Gibby v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Katherine Seward Gibby
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. Hain Celestial Group Inc et al
as 3:2024cv02830
Plaintiff:
Jewel Mosley
Defendant:
Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Nurture Inc., Danone S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heard v. County of San Diego, State of California
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Dejon Heard
Defendant:
County of San Diego, State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00848
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
