Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Brandon v. Musoff et al
as 1:2010cv09017
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Brandon
Defendant:
Jay K. Musoff, Timothy Coleman, Marsh McLennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Timothy Coleman
as 10-10796
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE COLEMAN
Brandon v. Musoff et al
as 0:2010cv00030
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Brandon
Defendant:
Jay K. Musoff, Timothy Coleman and Marsh McLennan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEVELAND v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2009cv04603
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY COLEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and A.T.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capitol Specialty Ins Corp v. Columbo's LLC et al
as 3:2009cv01306
Plaintiff:
Capitol Specialty Ins Corp
Defendant:
Columbo's LLC, Laurie LaFlamme, Donald Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-4215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv03436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Coleman v. City of Tucson
as 4:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Tucson, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Umlauf et al v. Monex Health Care Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00470
Petitioner:
Martin Umlauf, Martin Umlauf, Jeffrey Isaacson and others
Respondent:
Monex Health Care Systems, Inc., Podiatry Network, Inc., Chiropractic Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv01536
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
