Cases 91 - 100 of 7,676
Gail Shipman, et al v. Aquatherm LP, et al
as 22-3224
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GAIL SHIPMAN, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Roy Marvin Shipman, Jr., deceased, ROY SHIPMAN, III and JUSTIN SHIPMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
AQUATHERM LP, N.J. YATES ADN COMPANY INC, LANDSTAR RANGER INC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ARCO INDUSTRIAL SALES INC, d/b/a Arco Packaging/Janitorial Sales
Defendant:
NH YATES AND CO INC
Glen Dotson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-3470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glen Thomas Dotson
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P. Yates, Christopher Halk and others
Alexander v. Yates
as 4:2022cv01147
Plaintiff:
Devontay Alexander
Respondent:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Carey Mills
as 22-10304
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAREY MILLS
Rose v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rose
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mike Bordelon, et al v. Baldwin County, AL, et al
as 22-13958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MIKE BORDELON and BREEZY SHORES, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
BALDWIN COUNTY, AL, MATTHEW BROWN and BALDWIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
United States of America v. Yates
as 22-3003
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Manuel Enrique Yates
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, B Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
CloudofChange, LLC v. NCR Corporation
as 23-1170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLOUDOFCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
NCR CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
