Cases 71 - 80 of 1,182,629
Hendrick v. Dean, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Larnell E. Hendrick
Defendant:
Robert Dean, Jr., Lieutnant Ahmed, Dr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggin v. Fiorilli et al
as 9:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Chandler Joseph Riggin
Defendant:
Joanna Fiorilli, John Doe #1-5 and Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado-Guerrero v. USA
as 8:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Gustavo Alvarado-Guerrero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong et al
as 2:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Cedriguez McCaa
Defendant:
FCI-Herlong, S. Salmonson, Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croskery v. USA
as 1:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Cyrus Croskery
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fukama-Kabika v. Jones
as 2:2024cv02091
Petitioner:
Jean A Fukama-Kabika
Respondent:
Chance Jones
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochran v. Matherly et al
as 4:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Cochran
Defendant:
Martin Matherly, Tyler Garza and Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner:
Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLARK v. PLATT et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. CLARK, II
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, KEITH HARTZELL, PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
