Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 332,141
NEUMAN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NEUMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Collier Smalling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06249
Plaintiff:
Ollizet R Collier Smalling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Tina Marie Miller
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carista v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Kathryne Irene Carista
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Valentine v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06257
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Valentine
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
YOUNG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
ANNA MARIE YOUNG
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Maxson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lisa J Maxson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Birckel v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Brenda Joann Birckel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Acevedo Pagan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Acevedo Pagan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schultz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Kim M Schultz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
