Cases 171 - 180 of 846,121
MOBLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00201
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
SEROY MOBLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carter v. Jeffers et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Windows USA, LLC, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Benjamin Andrew Jeffers
Plaintiff:
Cherish Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Parks et al v. Crenshaw et al
as 8:2024cv06273
Defendant:
Brandon Cobb and Sheriff Mike Crenshaw
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Parks and Kayla Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper et al v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2024cv02842
Plaintiff:
William E. Cooper, Sr. and Ewayna M. Brown
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Sgt. McCaslin, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Linwood v. Finance America LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02746
Defendant:
US Bank Trust National Association, Mortgage Electronic Systems Inc, Finance America LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Ann Linwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. Alan Ritchey Inc.
as 2:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Alan Ritchey Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sublett v. Hisco, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Jerry Sublett
Defendant:
Hisco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santiago v. City of Rochester Police Department
as 24-2880
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. SANTIAGO and MELISSA A. LAFFREDO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER RENZ, Christopher Renz individually and in his capacity as a City of Rochester Police Officer, LIEUTENANTS UNKNOWN, ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT, North Clinton Goodman Section and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
