Cases filed in Arizona matching "S"
Cases 171 - 180 of 831,895
Espinoza v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff: Mary Espinoza
Defendant: Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Campbell v. Hollingsworth et al
as 7:2024cv03711
Plaintiff: Andy G Campbell
Defendant: Timothy S Hollingsworth and Western Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
York v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff: Meranda York
Defendant: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Lopez v. Picaso et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff: John Lopez
Defendant: Hezrai Picaso and Atilano Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Pires v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01617
Plaintiff: Victor Pires
Defendant: AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Goldsberry v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01620
Petitioner: Todd Goldsberry
Respondent: AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hill v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2024cv01131
Plaintiff: Brian T. Hill
Defendant: Jennifer Shaffer, Brian Roberts, Richard Jallins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gipson et al v. Hines Va-drunk tank et al
as 1:2024cv05396
Plaintiff: Angela R. Gipson
Defendant: Hines Va-drunk tank, S Chunduri, B Killion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MacDonald #298537 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01584
Petitioner: Ian A MacDonald
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PARKINSON v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00110
Petitioner: BRADLEY PARKINSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?