Cases 91 - 100 of 545
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 1:2023cv02368
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, META, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 4:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 3:2023cv12399
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GIULIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodfield v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Chris Woodfield
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc., X Corp., X Holdings I, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
Hall v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL E. HALL, a/k/a Sensa Verogna
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Arnold et al v. X Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Defendant:
X Corp., X Holdings Corp., Twitter Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wolfram Arnold, Erik Froese, Tracy Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 1:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GUILIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ma v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03301
Petitioner:
Fabien Ho Ching Ma
Respondent:
Twitter, Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Patent Armory Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
