Social Security Cases filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama matching "S"
Cases 261 - 270 of 832,323
Rigal, Quelyory v. U. S. Attorney General et al
as 0:2024cv61156
Plaintiff: Quelyory A. Rigal and Quelyory Antonelly Rigal El
Defendant: U. S. Attorney General, Riselda Ruiz, Albin Calixte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramey v. Navajo Express, Inc.
as 1:2024cv05541
Plaintiff: Kevin Ramey
Defendant: Navajo Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Karstetter #31890 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01605
Petitioner: Corey Axon Karstetter
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. Dimon et al
as 3:2024cv01147
Plaintiff: Marquese Hines
Defendant: Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan, Chairholder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv01116
Petitioner: JAMES GENE WILSON
Respondent: DONALD S. EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAY v. MATHEMA et al
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A. RAY
Defendant: S. MATHEMA and M. BREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. MALLOY et al
as 1:2024cv07509
Plaintiff: HENRY M. LOVE
Defendant: FRANCIS MALLOY, EDWIN MALDONADO and SYID EVANS WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DARGAN v. BLAIR COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff: DONALD DARGAN
Defendant: BLAIR COUNTY and D.A.'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zito LLC v. Fastenal Company
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff: Zito LLC
Defendant: Fastenal Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?