Other Civil Rights Featured Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 540
Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv04207
Plaintiff: Google Inc.
Defendant: Equustek Solutions Inc., Clarma Enterprises Inc. and Robert Angus
Amicu: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3775
Plaintiff - Appellant: Melissa Zarda, co-independent executors of the estate of Donald Zarda and William Allen Moore, Jr., co-independent executor of the estate of Donald Zarda
Defendant - Appellee: Altitude Express, Inc., doing business as Skydive Long Island and Ray Maynard
Amicus Curiae: New York Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union, 9 to 5, National Association of Working Women and others
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1351
Plaintiff - Appellee: INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, ALLAN HAKKY and others
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
MONTGOMERY et al v. COMEY et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01074
Plaintiff: LARRY KLAYMAN and DENNIS MONTGOMERY
Defendant: JAMES B. COMEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , MICHAEL S. ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending: DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending: TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
Twitter, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al Featured Case
as 3:2017cv01916
Plaintiff: Twitter, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, John F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
State of Hawaii, et al v. Donald Trump, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15589
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF HAWAII and ISMAIL ELSHIKH
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Arab American Civil Rights League et al v. Donald Trump et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv10310
Plaintiff: Arab American Civil Rights League, Kokab Algazali, Hend Alshawaish and others
Defendant: Donald Trump, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: The Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, National Native American Bar Association and others
Doe et al v. Donald Trump, President of The United States et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00178
Plaintiff: Jane Doe , John Doe and Episcopal Diocese of Olympia
Defendant: Donald Trump, U.S. Department of State, Rex Tillerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unite Oregon v. Trump et al Featured Case
as 3:2017cv00179
Defendant: John D. Barnes, John Kelly, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
CBP: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DHS: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff: Unite Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?