Cases 1 - 10 of 814,479
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ross v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Ross
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Hamilton County General Sessions Court, Hamilton County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tepe v. Halvorson et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Erik Halvorson, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP and National Life Insurance Company of the Southwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kiner v. Shelby County Health Department et al
as 2:2024cv02412
Plaintiff:
Gerald Kiner
Defendant:
Shelby County Health Department and Travis Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Liu v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02413
Plaintiff:
Xiang Liu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and Lynuel Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
