Cases 1 - 10 of 50,708
O'Neil v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02113
Petitioner:
David O'Neil
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, David F. Zeyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zielbauer #306410 v. Monarrez et al
as 4:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Zielbauer
Defendant:
Joseph Monarrez, III and Pima County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kern v. Drummond et al
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Stephen R.F. Kern, Jr.
Defendant:
David Drummond and Tasheena Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD, VICE CHAIRMAN DAVID HERRING, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Christopher Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milcendeau v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
David James Milcendeau
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Cherokee County, et al
as 6:2024cv03423
Plaintiff:
David Farrell Sullivan
Defendant:
Cherokee County and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wanda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Lee Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Kind et al
as 1:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
David Watts
Defendant:
John Kind, Mr Hoffman, Hana Utter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
