Cases 1 - 10 of 22,860
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAWTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Carrea v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
Christopher Carrea
Respondent:
State of California, County of San Diego and San Diego County Public Defenders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peoples v. McManus et al
as 1:2024cv04564
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Peoples
Defendant:
Deputy McManus and Sgt. Reinhard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Denise et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tyler Hill
Defendant:
Denise, Ashley, Triston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. West
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gardner
Defendant:
David West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYBERRY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MAYBERRY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
