Cases 61 - 70 of 191
Petty et al v. Department of Children Services et al
as 3:2019cv01085
Plaintiff:
J. P., R. P. and An Jani Petty
Defendant:
Department of Children Services and Knokeya Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendes v. Beahm et al
as 5:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Taryn Logan, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson Mendes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Lincoln County et al
as 2:2019cv00237
Defendant:
Lucas Mallon, Wade W Magers, Lincoln County and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Clayton Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOE et al v. WOODBRIDGE et al
as 2:2019cv14139
Defendant:
DEF CORP 1-10, SUPERVISOR PAULA POE 1-10, GHI CORP. 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
K. O., MARY MOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carr v. Tate et al (TV2)
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
Travis B Holly, Schatz & Associates, Richard Slaydon and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E Carr, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boone v. Bowie County Texas et al
as 3:2018cv02438
Defendant:
Matt Keil, Michael Bernoudy, Tina Petty and others
Plaintiff:
Edward C Boone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yoest et al v. McEvoy, et al
as 4:2018cv00611
Defendant:
Pettis County, Missouri, Missouri Clay County, Ray County Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Yoest, Five Star Investors, LLC, Liberty Assets LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boone v. Wilson et al
as 3:2018cv02072
Defendant:
Michael Friedman, Tina Petty, Sherl Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Edward C Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petties v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv02516
Plaintiff:
Craig Petties
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. DIAZ-PETTI et al
as 1:2018cv09397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEWIS
Defendant:
CARMEN DIAZ-PETTI, CHRISTINE NORBUT BEYER, JENNIFER MALLOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
