Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 72
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Defendant: SUSAN DOYLE, in her official capacity as DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PROSECUTORIAL DISTRICT 13, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KAREN BRINSON BELL, in her official capacity as EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: ACTION NC and NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant: Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIM et al v. HANLON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01098
Plaintiff: ANDY KIM, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant: CHRISTINE GIORDANO HANLON, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO and others
Intervenor: LAURA ALI, JOSE ARANGO, New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund and others
Interested Party: DALE CROSS, JEFF PARROTT and TAHESHA WAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolef Turns, Inc. et al v. Youngkin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff: Nolef Turns, Inc. and Gregory Williams
Defendant: Glenn Youngkin and Kay Coles James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska et al v. Thurston County, Nebraska et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00020
Plaintiff: Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, Victoria Kitcheyan and others
Defendant: Thurston County, Nebraska, Thurston County Board of Supervisors, Mark English and others
Counter Claimant: Glenn Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mi Familia Vota v. Abbott
as 22-50777
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mi Familia Vota, Marla Lopez, Marlon Lopez and others
Defendant / Appellant: Gregory W. Abbott, In His Official Capacity as Governor of Texas, John B. Scott, In His Official Capacity as Secretary of State of Texas and Warren K. Paxton, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Texas
IN RE GEORGIA SENATE BILL 202
as 1:2021mi55555
Plaintiff: The New Georgia Project, Black Voters Matter Fund, Rise, Inc. and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae: Amicus Curiae, American Center for Law and Justice, Foundation for Government Accountability and others
Petitioner: District of Columbia, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Senator Max Burns and others
Not Classified By Court: Clerk of the Superio Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Voto Latino et al v. Scott et al
as 1:2021cv00965
Plaintiff: Voto Latino, Rosalinda Ramos Abuabara, Akilah Bacy and others
Defendant: John Scott and Gregory Wayne Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Gomillion et al v. Lightfoot et al
as 3:2058cv00462
Plaintiff: C. G. Gomillion, Celia B. Chambers, Alma R. Craig and others
Defendant: Phil M. Lightfoot, G. B. Edwards, Jr., L. D. Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Washington Election Integrity Coalition United et al v. Anderson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv05726
Plaintiff: Washington Election Integrity Coalition United, Kevin Schmadeka, Kelly Worden and others
Defendant: Julie Anderson, Pierce County and Does 1-30
Intervenor Defendant: Washington State Democratic Central Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?