Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2009cv01870
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Warden: Dauphin County Prison, Dauphin County Probation Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2009cv00251
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Schiriro
as 2:2008cv01442
Petitioner:
Franklin Charles Smith
Respondent:
Dora Schiriro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Quarterman
as 08-20158
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smith v. Akers et al
as 2:2008cv00453
Petitioner:
Franklin Charles Smith
Respondent:
Linda A Akers, Julie P Newell, Arizona Attorney General, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 9:2008cv00050
Petitioner:
James Charles Smith
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00652
Petitioner:
James Charles Smith
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Norris
as 5:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Larry Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Smith v. D Dexter
as 2:2008cv00390
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Respondent:
D Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. MOORE
as 1:2007cv00773
Petitioner:
GARY CHARLES SMITH
Respondent:
GARY O. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
