Cases 51 - 60 of 380
Saquing v. Mallett et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald Ellzy Woodall, Wexler Medical and others
Plaintiff:
John Milton Saquing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cintron v. Bochnak
as 1:2020cv00823
Defendant:
C/O Bochnak and Ron Hain
Plaintiff:
Milton Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington et al v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv00122
Plaintiff:
Terry Patterson, Hassan Grimes, Milton Washington and others
Defendant:
. Kevin Ransom, Department of Corrections, Governor Tom Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. Garden et al
as 5:2019ct03379
Defendant:
Brian Peluso, George Marinez, Lt. Daniel Garden and others
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doggette v. Puckett et al
as 5:2019cv01921
Defendant:
Tyler Peppers, T. Driggers, Ron Puckett and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Young Doggette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Correctional et al
as 3:2019cv01878
Defendant:
Department of Correctional and State of Connecticut
Plaintiff:
Milton campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Miller County Jail
as 4:2019cv04131
Plaintiff:
Milton Carter, Jr
Defendant:
Miller County Jail, Officer Golde, Sgt. Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Miller County Jail
as 4:2019cv00705
Plaintiff:
Milton Carter, Jr
Defendant:
Miller County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiles v. John Doe et al
as 3:2019cv00697
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Jiles
Defendant:
J. Stubbs, Mario A. Grady, Vicksburg Police Department and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2019cv05027
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
J Guilin, United States Marshals Service, R Summerland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
