Cases 71 - 80 of 331
Young, et al v. Ledet, et al
as 2:2020cv02165
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cornelius Young, III, John Fitzgerald Bonvillain, Jr., Chad Knox and others
Defendant:
Mitch Dupre, Stephen Bergeron, Rhonda Ledet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Remache et al
as 5:2020ct03221
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Jeffrey Hargrove, Sgt. Remache and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. C.C.C.-Core Civic et al
as 4:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Peter Molar and C.C.C.-Core Civic
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lee Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. C.C.C.-Core Civic et al
as 6:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Peter Molar and C.C.C.-Core Civic
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lee Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewster v. Doe I et al
as 5:2020cv03172
Defendant:
(fnu) Kidd, (fnu) Rice, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Brewster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Bennett et al
as 5:2020ct03198
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Melissa Morle, Shirley Bennett, Ms. Ramache and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Gwathney et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Clifford Walker and Leigh Gwathney
Plaintiff:
Kendall Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Lewis et al
as 4:2020cv00699
Defendant:
Brick Lewis and Van Buren County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Clifford Lewis Moody, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Curtis
as 5:2020ct03187
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Dr. Clifford Curtis, NC Department of Public Safety and Ms. Flemaning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00565
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
