Cases 1 - 10 of 84
FARLEY v. DOBBS et al
as 1:2024cv00915
Defendant:
IDC CENTRAL OFFICE, ROBERT ROBERTSON, LEAH ARRINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY FARLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiff v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv11302
Defendant:
Macadio, Dobb, Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Stiff
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Brown v. Dobbs et al
as 2:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Allan M Brown
Defendant:
Officer Dobbs, Officer Zimmerman and Kenosha County Sheriff's Department/Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willingham v. Dobbs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willingham
Defendant:
James Dobbs, Barbra Strom and Everrte Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOBBS v. S.C.I. PHOENIX SUPERINTENDENT SORBER et al
as 2:2023cv04901
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. DOBBS
Defendant:
S.C.I. PHOENIX SUPERINTENDENT SORBER, DEPUTY SIPPLE, DR. LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Kiefer et al
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Doctor, Doctors, Naph Care Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Josand Farmer v. US
as 23-6538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSAND FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Brian K. Dobbs)
Dobbs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
John C Dobbs
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pickard v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kyle Pickard
Defendant:
Mike Jones, Mark Dobbs, Shane Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickard v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kyle Pickard
Defendant:
Mike Jones, Mark Dobbs, Shane Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
