Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Outlaw v. Meade et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Outlaw
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer #529310 v. Ensing et al
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Spencer #529310
Defendant:
Matthew Ensing, Margaret Greiner, Brian Majerszyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRY v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES SPRY
Defendant:
JON DOE, JANE DOE, WAKENDA GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer #529310 v. Annis et al
as 1:2022cv01181
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Spencer #529310
Defendant:
Unknown Annis, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Dukes et al
as 4:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
David Nicholas James
Defendant:
B Dukes, Johnson, Barbria Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernow v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Fernow
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, Wade Gilliam, Tonya Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Crittenden County Correctional Facility, Teresa Bonner, Kat Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05749
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Parties, Towers/Durango Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Grimes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEREMES v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES KEREMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KEREMES v. CLARK et al
as 1:2018cv00368
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, MS. WHITE and OFFICER MITEGNEY
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES KEREMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
