Cases 21 - 30 of 57
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv05210
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II and others
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs, Little Lobbyists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Phi Doan v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60485
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
PHI THANH DOAN
Iota Phi Lambda Sorority, Inc. v. Contenta Global Capital Group, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv00532
Defendant:
Contenta Global Capital Group, Inc., Cheryl Broussard and Contenta Global Capital Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
IOTA Phi Lambda Sorority, Inc.
US v. Phi Nguyen
as 19-6006
Defendant / Appellant:
PHI VAN NGUYEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Theta Beta Sigma Chapter of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Incorporated, et al
as 2:2018cv04406
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Incorporated Alpha Gamma Zeta Chapter , William Harris , Dimitri Ashmore and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
PHI Air Medical, LLC v. New Mexico Office of Superintendent of Insurance et al
as 1:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
PHI Air Medical, LLC
Defendant:
New Mexico Office of Superintendent of Insurance , John G. Franchini and Jeremy Rodriguez-Ortega
Counter_claimant:
New Mexico Office of Superintendent of Insurance
Counter_defendant:
PHI Air Medical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PHI Air Medical, L.L.C. v. Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development et al
as 3:2018cv00347
Plaintiff:
PHI Air Medical, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Burns Phillips, Abbie Hudgens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
