Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Stanfield v. City of Puyallup et al
as 3:2022cv05994
Plaintiff:
Kevin A Stanfield
Defendant:
City of Puyallup, Dean Johnson, Andrea Beall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanfield v. Puyallup, City of et al
as 3:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stanfield
Defendant:
Puyallup, City of, Dean Johnson, Andrea Beall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanfield et al v Lundberg and Associates et al
as 2:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Scott Stanfield and Nissa Stanfield
Defendant:
Lundberg and Associates, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and NewRez doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldman v. Brink, et al.
as 3:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Paul Goldman
Defendant:
Christopher Piper, Virginia State Board of Elections, Jamilah D LeCruise and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Thomas, Jr. and Joshua Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Oneonta, City of, Charles Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stanfield v. State of Washington
as 3:2020cv06209
Plaintiff:
Kevin A Stanfield
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01813
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Wilson v. Stanfield
as 1:2018cv01113
Defendant:
Nina Russell Stanfield
Plaintiff:
Lee Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
