Cases 11 - 20 of 17,571
Navarro v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Cesar M. Navarro
Respondent:
United States of America
Damon et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Damon Damon, Damon Ricardo Brown and Christie Damon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richmond v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Courtney Richmond
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Trooper Jordan Anderson, Officer Kevin Krohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
COPELAND, MD v. TOWNHOUSE AT ST REGIS et al
as 2:2024cv06687
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, MD
Defendant:
TOWNHOUSE AT ST REGIS, EILEEN LUKAS, WALLACK, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States Government
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Travis B Williams
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Xu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 3:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Zhehu Xu
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. METHUSELAH TREE LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
METHUSELAH TREE LLC, ROBERT ROSS, RLR ENTERPRISES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
