Cases 61 - 70 of 337
Batista v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Defendant:
Machiste Rankin, Kimberly Dy, Elise Swearingen and others
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Batista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrett et al v. City of Pelahatchie, Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Barrett and Dris Mitchell
Defendant:
Joseph Daughtry, Bryan Bailey, City of Pelahatchie, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States Of America et al
as 2:2021cv00096
Defendant:
United States District Court, Thomas R. Cahill, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Elliott Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin v. Ruby et al
as 1:2020cv02232
Defendant:
Theresa K Gross and Tawni Ruby
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robert Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polland v. Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv07054
Plaintiff:
Ramses Polland
Defendant:
Joshua Rankin, City of Chicago and Russell Ellis II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lu v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv12010
Defendant:
James R Clarke, Charles W Rankin, James L Sultan and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.P. et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv01547
Defendant:
Pamela Clark, Andrew Vanderusen, Amber Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Pollock, A.P., G.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Wilson v. County of Contra Costa, et al
as 20-16630
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JOHN MUIR HEALTH, BRADLEY DAVIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Boudjerada et al v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2020cv01265
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hendry, Erin Grady, Hasheem Boudjerada and others
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Does 1-20, Bo Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
