Cases 61 - 70 of 109
Medved v. U.S. Department of Justice et al.
as 4:2016cv02334
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Oak Ridge School Board of Education et al (TWP2)
as 2:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Edward Anderson
Defendant:
Oak Ridge School Board of Education , Bruce Borchers and Mark Marczach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Regina Hunter v. Nikki Haley
as 15-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINA M. HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE HONORABLE NIKKI R. HALEY, Governor, State of South Carolina Government, MR. GARY A. MIXON, Administrator, Sumter County South Carolina Government, MRS. NAOMI D. SANDERS, Chairman D-1, Sumter County South Carolina Government and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00820
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sandberg v. Rudd, et al
as 4:2015cv00468
Defendant:
C. R. Rudd , MarqE GP Company, LLC , Fidelis Realty Partners, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Sandberg, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hunter v. Haley et al
as 3:2015cv00547
Plaintiff:
Regina M Hunter
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley, Gary A Mixon, Naomi D Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BROWN v. COTTRELL et al
as 3:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
TROY IVAN BROWN
Defendant:
CALVIN KENNETH COTTRELL, SCOTT THOMAS CUTHRELL, JOHN EDWARD GADDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROANE v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00377
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, JOHN F. CARAWAY, JOHN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ROANE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CHAMBERLAIN v. EDWARDS
as 1:2014cv00837
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. CHAMBERLAIN
Defendant:
JOHN EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
