Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Harris v. Easley et al
as 4:2023cv04086
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Harris
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Easley, Brandon Yeley, Mason Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Easley et al v. Town of Kingsford Heights, Indiana et al
as 3:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EASLEY and EMILY GALLOWAY
Defendant:
TOWN OF KINGSFORD HEIGHTS, INDIANA, TOWN COUNCIL OF KINGSFORD HEIGHTS, INDIANA and Kingsford Heights, Indiana Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metz v. City of Easley South Carolina
as 8:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
George D Metz, II
Defendant:
City of Easley South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ann Woodson Easley v. Michael R. Moore et al
as 2:2022cv07815
Plaintiff:
Ann Woodson Easley
Defendant:
Police Chief Michael R. Moore and Police Officer Paul Ulmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Helms et al
as 2:2022cv04129
Plaintiff:
Dennis Harmon
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Bryce Easley, Nevin Seaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WILLIAMS v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BERRY, ERIC MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
