Cases 1 - 10 of 88
McCoo v. BJC Health System et al
as 4:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Treina McCoo
Defendant:
BJC Health System doing business as BJC Healthcare, Sophia Easterling, Cassandra Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Easterling v. Murthy
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kevin Easterling
Defendant:
Ravindra Murthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Easterling v. Housing Authority et al
as 3:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
Sharese Easterling
Defendant:
Housing Authority, Scranton Police and Scranton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Richard v. Max Credit Union et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Richard
Defendant:
Max Credit Union, Martin Head, Chambless Math and Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. The City of Magee, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Virginia Hayes
Defendant:
The City of Magee, Mississippi, Charles R. Crawford, Vernon Dampier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EASTERLING v. MIAMI VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
MIAMI VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
EASTERLING v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JAMES P. HANLON, JANE MAGNUS-STINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Easterling, r v. Afzal et al
as 3:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Defendant:
Kamron Afzal, Thomas Hagel and Carl Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Easterling v. DeWine et al
as 3:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Defendant:
Mike DeWine and Thomas Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
