Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Brauning v. Christian, et al
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB WAYNE BRAUNING
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GILBERT CHRISTIAN, individual and Sheriff of Pontotoc County, CHARLES STEVEN KESSINGER, individual and District Judge of Pontotoc County, LORI LYNN JACKSON, individual and Associate District Judge and others
Chestnut et al v. Klund et al
as 0:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lewis Chestnut, Lawrence Anthony Barnes, Charles Nguyen Thorstad and others
Defendant:
Darcy Klund, Michael Kennedy, Joseph Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brauning v. Christian et al
as 6:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
John Gilbert Christian, Charles Steven Kessinger, Lori Lynn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEUMILLER v. CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2019cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Roger Neumiller
Defendant:
CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA and Lee Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Pamranker et al
as 4:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Walker
Defendant:
Paige Pamranker and Keener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Walker v. Brian Coffey, et al
as 17-2172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL LEE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SENIOR DEPUTY BRIAN T. COFFEY, In his individual capacity and SPECIAL AGENT PAUL ZIMMERER, in his individual capacity
WALKER v. COFFEY et al
as 2:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
CAROL LEE WALKER
Defendant:
BRIAN T. COFFEY and PAUL ZIMMERER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
