Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Augspurger v. Pyne, et al
as 21-1444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. AUGSPURGER, D.D.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS PYNE, D.D.S., in his official capacity, MARK ADAMS, D.D.S, MS, Panel Chair Panel A in his official capacity, PAIGE MCEVOY, MS, in her official capacity and others
Paulin v. MHA Gorman & Co Inc
as 4:2021cv01019
Plaintiff:
Bryant N Paulin
Defendant:
MHA Gorman & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattox v. MHA
as 2:2021cv02025
Defendant:
MHA
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MHA, LLC v. AMERIGROUP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv16042
Plaintiff:
MHA, LLC
Defendant:
AMERIGROUP CORPORATION, ABC COMPANIES 1-100, AMERIGROUP NEW JERSEY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bryant v. Puhl et al
as 1:2016cv03712
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mae Bryant
Defendant:
Todd Puhl, Pamela Monroe, Mark Richts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 16-1584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. H. DIGGS, (official/personal capacity), CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, MBA, MHA (official/personal capacity) and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, (offical/personal capacity)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv11883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hootstein, et al v. Mental Health Ass'n (MHA) Inc., et al
as 15-1502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HOOTSTEIN and KATHLYN STEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION (MHA) INC., JEROME RAY, NORTHAMPTON, MA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
