Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Garst v. City of Virden et al
as 3:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Garst
Defendant:
City of Virden and Harold E. Gist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
D'Amario v. Sturdy et al
as 1:2024cv11178
Plaintiff:
Arthur D'Amario, III
Defendant:
Mark E. Sturdy and Kyle P Heagney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Morrow v. Collazo et al
as 1:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
McKenzie Morrow
Defendant:
Angel O. Collazo, Everardo Bracamontes, Jr., Mark E. Hoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Bledsoe v. Jacot et al
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bledsoe
Defendant:
Katy Jacot, Mark E. Thiel, Pearlie Bledsoe Townes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lacy v. Taylor et al
as 2:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Albert William Lacy
Defendant:
Mark E. Taylor, Tammie Roberts, Clark D. Adkins and others
Interested Party:
Monique Lacy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv18576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dicks et al v. Hawaii Republican Party, et al et al
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Karl Orlando Dicks, James Ryan Malish and Daniel Decker
Defendant:
Hawaii Republican Party, et al, Shirlene Ostrov, Lynne Finnegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
