Cases 1 - 10 of 8,318
Joseph Lukuta, III v. Lena Angelella, et al
as 24-1902
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LUKUTA, III, Individually doing business as Lokuta's Garage Coporation
Defendant:
LENA ANGELELLA, Chief of Police, Pittston Township Police Department, DAVID SLEZAK, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Pittston Township, JOSEPH HAWK, Vice Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Pittston Township and others
Gaines v. Grand Lodge of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Gaines
Defendant:
Grand Lodge of Maryland, Regent University and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moaf et al v. Casey et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Mohsen Moaf and Jacqueline A Moaf
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Dan Gordon, Robert Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Stephens et al v. AT&T et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Raelun Stephens, Sr. and KR&R Appliance
Defendant:
AT&T and Automation Personnel Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lin v. Wray
as 24-10420
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, United States Department of Justice, (CA), Chad Yarbrough and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
