Cases 131 - 140 of 3,951
Murphy #769317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murphy #769317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Murphy
as 4:2024cv40005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURDO v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CURDO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., JACLYN CASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Felix Murphy, III
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORMAN v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE HOWARD FORMAN
Defendant:
NURSE MURPHY, NURSE PITTS and DECATUR COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akinlawon v. Mayo et al
as 9:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Ayotunji Akinlawon
Defendant:
Gregory D. Mayo, Oneil, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmody v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024mc00002
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Carmody
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Frank Strada, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAFNER v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, MATTHEW J. PLATKIN and TAHESHA WAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Begay v. USA
as 3:2024cv08000
Petitioner:
Murphy Alex Begay
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wilson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Blake Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Wills, Lewey, Lt. Royster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
