Cases 11 - 20 of 12,802
Davis v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00794
Defendant:
James Gibson, Carroll, Gooley and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Conningham et al
as 4:2024cv00783
Defendant:
Does Medical Staff and Conningham
Plaintiff:
Isaac Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raits v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Volusia County)
as 6:2024cv01677
Respondent:
florida department of corrections
Petitioner:
Adam J Raits
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Martin
Defendant:
Baker, Baker, Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jennings v.Narrison
as 1:2024cv12374
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Jennings, Jr.
Defendant:
Adam Narrison, Dr Zeizal, Mental Health Expert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill #793484 v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00961
Defendant:
Ronald Fenner, Kristopher W. Spaulding, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Hill #793484
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Schmitt et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Michael A. Schmitt and Trent Walker
Plaintiff:
Stanley Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONROE v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00770
Defendant:
JEFFREY R. COOKE, MITCHELL JOHNSON, JAMIE ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
DEVONTA J. MONROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Adams
as 3:2024cv01114
Respondent:
Warden Robert Adams
Petitioner:
LaNorris O'Brien Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Douglas
as 4:2024cv12422
Petitioner:
Dexter Carl Jones
Respondent:
Adam Douglas
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
