Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Nichols v. Jackson et al
as 2:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Lay, Dexter Payne, D W Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00004
Petitioner:
ANDRE W. JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Weaver et al
as 1:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Davis, Bridgette Strawser, Eddie Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Andre W Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Otis Michael Thomas v. Sergeant Michael Mattox et al
as 2:2019cv07560
Defendant:
Frederick W. Jackson, Police Officer James Lewis, Police Officer Kelly Sandell and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2019cv00383
Defendant:
Evalis L.O.R., State of Ohio, Dept. Warden Oper. D. Luneke and others
Plaintiff:
Leondre Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Doe et al
as 6:2019cv06138
Plaintiff:
Edward W. Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe, R. Bishop, Joseph Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danglar v. DHS et al
as 1:2018cv05637
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
DHS, Scott Pitman, W. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Dozier
as 1:2018cv04359
Respondent:
Greg Dozier
Petitioner:
Steven W. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 4:2018cv01450
Plaintiff:
Lajohn Fitzgerald Wilson
Defendant:
John W. Jackson, Neal G. Naccarato and Robert Mohammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otis Thomas v. Michael Mattox, et al
as 17-56916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MATTOX, Sgt.; No. 3373, in official capacity, JUSTIN EISENBERG, Captain, in official capacity, MARTIN BLAND, Senior Management Analyst, Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
