Cases 11 - 20 of 4,723
Eytcheson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Franklin Gene Eytcheson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Richardson v. Franklin County Corrections Center et al
as 2:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Richardson
Defendant:
Franklin County Corrections Center, Nurse Linda Doe and Nurse Sandy Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holmes v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
James Franklin Holmes
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frye v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 5:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Marion Wade Frye
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Director Bryan Sterling, Kenneth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Franklin v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jason Javon Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Carter County Detention Center, Devra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-5044
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, Governor, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director and others
MARSHALL v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MARSHALL
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, MAKAYLA, HEATHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin Wright v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1614
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WRIGHT
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Boehler v. Byers et al
as 6:2024cv06043
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Boehler
Defendant:
Superintendent Jared Byers, Lieutenant Crosby, Lieutenant Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
