Cases 11 - 20 of 43
McLemore v. Bradley
as 5:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Joe Winfrey McLemore
Defendant:
John Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRADLEY v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 2:2018cv01348
Petitioner:
JOHN BRADLEY
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Peters, Sr. v. Jason Brown, et al
as 17-3087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN BRADLEY PETERS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF JASON BROWN, SERGEANT KEVIN BICKLE, OFFICER WILLIAM GALLAGHER and others
Bills v. Bradley
as 3:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Clester Bills
Defendant:
John Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. PHILBIN
as 7:2016cv00081
Petitioner:
JOHN BRADLEY
Respondent:
EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETERS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRADLEY PETERS, SR.
Defendant:
JASON BROWN, KEVIN BICKLE, WILLIAM GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi v. Terry McAuliffe
as 15-7748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY MCAULIFFE, Virginia Governor, HARVEY BRYANT, Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach, KATHERINE ELIZABETH ORSINI, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney of Virginia Beach and others
Bradley v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 1:2014cv00105
Petitioner:
John Bradley
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
St. Jules v. Reed et al
as 2:2013cv00954
Plaintiff:
Kristofer St. Jules
Defendant:
Harvey Reed, Arthur James, John Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Anderson et al
as 1:2013cv00464
Defendant:
American Correctional Association, Kenneth Anderson, Austin Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Curtiss Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
