Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Morra v. Calaballo et al
as 6:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
William J. Morra, Jr.
Defendant:
Tiana Calaballo, Jennifer Lynn Peters, Lisa K. Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmanuel McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau
as 22-7384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL LEE MCGRIFF EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRALIZE INFRACTION BUREAU, NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Urrey v. Harrell et al
as 3:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Mark A Urrey
Defendant:
Calvin Harrell, Abraham Keefer and C Ryan Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau et al
as 5:2022ct03311
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Centralize Infraction Bureau, North Carolina Superior Court, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. County of Jefferson et al
as 9:2020cv01192
Plaintiff:
Mark James Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
County of Jefferson, Kory Keefer, Guilfoyle Ambulance Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Board #766060 v. Keefer
as 2:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Unknown Keefer
Plaintiff:
Ryan Board #766060
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. Keefer et al
as 3:2020cv00856
Defendant:
C/O Keefer, Internal Affairs Borwin, Supervisor Allsup and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv04921
Defendant:
ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK, EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER MONTGOMERY, SHERRI JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEFER v. USA
as 3:2019cv03285
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
STERLING RANDALL KEEFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Eaglin v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2019cv09659
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Keefer Lamar Eaglin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
