Cases 21 - 30 of 666
Roderick Rankin v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roderick Leshun Rankin
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Taylor v. The State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv03088
Plaintiff:
Lamajor Undreaous Taylor
Defendant:
The State of Mississippi, Governor Tate Reeves, Lauderdale County of Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaurin v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv03054
Plaintiff:
Moses Jerome McLaurin
Defendant:
Ricky J. Davis and Rankin County Sheriff Office
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moretto v. Warden Rogers et al
as 2:2023cv14315
Plaintiff:
Stephen Andrew Moretto
Defendant:
Warden Rogers, Warden Cox, R Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Landers
as 6:2023cv01477
Petitioner:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Respondent:
Sheriff Landers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MALDONADO v. RANKIN
as 5:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO
Defendant:
DEPUTY SHERRIFF RANKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Shapiro et al.
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robert Rankin
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Xavior Becerra, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grice #254091 v. Hairston et al
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff:
Arthur Grice #254091
Defendant:
Unknown Hairston, Jonathan Bowman, Kendra Warman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
Jeremy Rankins
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
