Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Hooker v. Lumpkin
as 21-11222
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clarence Lee Hooker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
CORREA-MARTINEZ v. NORTHERN STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2021cv14219
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO CORREA-MARTINEZ
Defendant:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON, OFFICER HOOKER, SGT. LYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Butts et al
as 3:2021cv01305
Plaintiff:
Joshua Payne
Defendant:
Charles Butts, Crig Copper, Margaret Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAN v. BUZAS et al
as 2:2021cv00968
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
AL STEVEN BUZAS, KAREN SOKOL, JOSEPH SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hooker v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00544
Defendant:
Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Hooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2021cv04228
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Maurice William Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eaden v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2021cv00486
Defendant:
Brooke Phillips, Brandi Cooper, William McManus and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Eaden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. BLACKWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ADELE KING
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, CHARLES S. BLACKWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00188
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Kendrick Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv00549
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Artez Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
