Cases 21 - 30 of 75
SLEDGE v. TRATE
as 1:2018cv00266
Plaintiff:
LARRY ALLEN SLEDGE
Defendant:
WARDEN TRATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith #305324 v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2018cv02609
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larry Graves v. Kim Holland
as 18-55546
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY ALLEN GRAVES
Respondent - Appellee:
KIM HOLLAND, Warden
MANN v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2018cv00176
Defendant:
"SECOND IN CHARGE" SHU, LARRY ALLEN, K. ARNETT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Names Currently Unknown:
SHU LT.
John Does #1- #10 Names Currently Unknown:
SHU OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson v. Lengerich et al
as 1:2018cv00588
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Thompson
Defendant:
Jason Lengerich, Jason (I) Lengerich, Jennifer Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawdy v. Allen et al
as 2:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Craig Dawdy
Defendant:
Larry Allen, Troy Bartley, Frank Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Hattiesburg Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Justin Ford
Defendant:
Hattiesburg Police Department, Larry Allen, C. Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Endicott et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Franklin G. Endicott and Craig Dawdy
Defendant:
Larry Allen, Troy Bartley, Frank Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulson v. Anderson et al
as 2:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Fulson
Defendant:
Tamara Anderson, Thomas Pryor, Suzanne E. Alt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Mize v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-51128
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY ALLEN MIZE
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
